how to avoid availability heuristic
It prompts people to get unnecessary medical care or be prescribed medication they don’t need.  Kahneman, D. (2011). Note: This is a part of the series “Outsmart Your Biases“. For this reason, if we’re trying to judge whether something is likely to happen (to make a risk assessment) if a similar event has occurred recently and/or past instances induced strong emotions that made their occurrence more memorable, we’re much more likely to predict that the event is likely to occ… Write down what wasted your time and how much time it wasted. The first is to be aware of—and avoid—the conditions that make you more likely to rely on the availability heuristic. What you might not realize is other dangers lurk at the beach. But if you know one or two matadors, watch out. One study indicates depression affects 6.5% of adults in a given year, and the lifetime risk for experiencing depression is 13% for males and 20 to 25% for females.  Chou, H. and Edge, N. (2012), ââThey are happier and having better lives than I amâ: The impact of using Facebook on perceptions of othersâ lives.â Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 15(2) 117-121. This showed they relied on ease of recall as a shortcut for diagnosing the problem with their car. We all talked about the tea bags running out how it effected us and what we were going to do to prevent it in the future. Theyâre just not posting pictures of themselves on Facebook. Easy equals true.  Barass, P. (1984). At 10 parts per billion, itâs 1 in 500. 17, No. If this team had a waste snake they would have added to the snake each time they boiled the kettle. In others, not. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. Shark attacks are more vivid and more likely to affect your behavior, even though riptides may be just as likely to kill you.. Availability bias describes the way in which human beings are biased toward judging events’ likelihood/frequency based on how easily their minds can conjure up examples of the event occurring in the past. But if you provoke a coconut, it is, statistically no more or less likely to respond with rage.  Shelor, R., Anderson, D., and Cross, M. (1992). âThe effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.â Journal of Experimental Psychology 125(2), 159â180. New York, NY: Viking. If not, make your decision slowly and carefullyâor better yet, go find some experts to lend a hand. âThe availability heuristic in the classroom: How soliciting more criticism can boost your course Negative events such as losing money or receiving criticism elicit a greater physiological and cognitive reaction than their corresponding positive events: making money or receiving praise. What comes to mind easily–recency–becomes a substitute for calculating the overall frequency. 3 pp. Others decided to avoid the hassle of extra security at the airports. Some participants were distracted while they reviewed the word lists. “Socially shared emotional experiences vs. emotional experiences kept secret: Differential characteristics and consequences.” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology Vol. What predicts divorce? Description.  Hansen and Hansen (1988). Our brain is wired to find the optimal balance between speed and accuracy, which means youâll never be able to completely overcome the availability heuristic. On a larger scale, the solution remains similar.  Finkenauer, C. and RimÃ©, B. As a result, you might judge that those events are more frequent or probable than others. If youâre a happy multitasking novice in a position of leadership, youâre more likely to recall events that are frequent, extreme, negative, recent, and vivid. They would also have added the lack of tea bags. In a 1989 study be de Turck and colleagues, the participants played the role of jurors, and some of them heard a witness get caught in a lie and then later tell the truth, and others heard him tell the truth and later get caught in a lie. Heuristics- First what are heuristics? This is the availability heuristic, “We make a judgement based on what we can remember, rather than complete data because we remember recent experiences or reports, then the news has a significant effect on our decisions.”. , Product recalls have the same effect. We’ve already seen how shark attacks are more likely to prevent us from going to the beach than risks from falling coconuts because they come to mind more easily. Our brain is wired to find the optimal balance between speed and accuracy, which means you’ll never be able to completely overcome the availability heuristic. The median length of a flood insurance policy is between two and four years. If the ratio falls below five-to-one, the relationship is likely to fail. The lesson here is that if you have just enough information to make a dangerous decision, you probably will. We are not good at predicting how often extreme, but rare, causes of death actually occur. âPolicy Tenure Under the U.S. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).â Risk Analysis, Vol. Because words where k is at the beginning, such as kite, keep, or kayak, come to mind easily when youâre thinking of the letter k. They are readily available in your memory. Even Hurricane Katrina didnât change the average policy length over the long term.  People are also more likely to buy stock after a large positive earnings surprise and they are more likely to sell stock after a large negative earnings surprise, compared to smaller earnings surprises. (1998). The world is a safer, more peaceful place than it ever has been. But if youâre making a judgment about the more distant past, positive events will come to mind more easily. What is your risk for cancer? ( Log Out / At the same time, we should acknowledge that even though our frequency isnât perfect, itâs actually not too bad, either. Oddly, each time someone is killed by a shark, the lives of ten people is saved who would otherwise have drowned from riptides. Weâve seen that a variety of factors make something easier to recall: frequent, extreme, negative, recent, and vivid events come to mind easily, which means they have an outsized influence on your judgments and decisions. There are more lawyers than tailors in your town. In some cases, it would be worth it. There are more pigeons than orioles in urban areas. Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress.  It was more difficult for mechanics to diagnose a problem with the car than non-expert drivers. If itâs easy to bring the data to mind, then the couple will divorce. (Iâve avoided flying through Minneapolis this year for the sole reason that I spent last Christmas Eve there, and I donât want to repeat that experience. In the experiment that proved this, peopleâs perception of how assertive they perceived themselves was directly correlated with how difficult it was to think of examples of assertive behavior.. This rate holds whether thereâs a natural disaster or not. These words are less availability in memory. People also thought tornados killed more people than asthma attacks, even though asthma attacks kill 20 times more people than tornadoes every year. . âBad is stronger than good.â Review of General Psychology, Vol 5(4), Dec 2001, 323-370. Those are vivid, memorable, and often negative experiences that leave a lasting impression. In a twisted way, being happy makes us more susceptible to the ease-of-recall bias, and this bias predisposes us to recall negative events over positive eventsâwhich changes our mood from happy to sad. Itâs a constant tradeoff. If you’ve just received great news that puts you in a good mood, avoid making a big decision. Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress. , Additionally, peopleâs memory of a negative event becomes less negative over time at a fairly measurable rate. Things that are vivid and emotionally jarring come to mind easily, which makes them more likely to influence your behavior.  Jarell, Gregg and Sam Peltzman, 1985, âThe Impact of Product Recalls on the Wealth of Sellers,â The Journal of Political Economy, 93, 512-536. According to a 2011 Gallup poll, 68% of people say there is more crime this year than last year and that crime is getting worse. Did you know you are twice as likely to be killed by a coconut at the beach than a shark? Representativeness bias is the reason why people create stereotypes. Build a team with diverse experiences and points of view. Note that they were not asked how many times they out. But thatâs not the case. (1991). Because easy equals true and hard equals false, the difficulty of thinking of negative feedback will cause students to discount the actual content of the negative feedback. People who were not distracted remembered 9.44 of the 15 words, and it took them 420 milliseconds to retrieve each word from memory. If you pay for flood insurance year after year without experiencing a flood, youâll question whether flood insurance is a necessary expense. Managers who recalled two moments of leisure time indicated greater satisfaction than managers who recalled ten moments of leisure time (4.95 vs. 3.82). When estimating the size of a category, like “dangerous animals,” if it’s easy to retrieve items for a category, you’ll judge the category to be large.  Gottman, J.M. Non-experts are more affected by ease-of-recall bias. Or you’ll remember the time you slept on the floor because you couldn’t get a flight until the next morning. However, as weâll see next, recent events tend to come to mind more easily, regardless of whether they are positive or negative. (2008), âWhen Subjective Experiences Matter: Power Increases Reliance on the Ease of Retrieval.â Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 94(6), June 2008, 956-970. After one year, 73.2% of flood insurance policies are still in place. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. You need to make decisions quickly and correctly. You buy life insurance, medical insurance, homeowners insurance, flood insurance, or earthquake insurance because thereâs a small chance youâll need it. In 1989, 63.1% of respondents estimated a 1 in 10 probability of a major earthquake damaging their community within the next 10 years. Most people assume the response would be yes. How do we avoid falling for the availability heuristic? Today we had a retrospective looking back at the last week. In another one of Tversky and Kahnemanâs thought experiments, they asked people to guess the likelihood of an imaginary couple getting a divorce. But when people were asked about the previous springâthe more distant pastâthere was no difference. They also strike at random: you can see a shark coming, but itâs impossible to predict when a coconut might fall. Once again, you can make a good guess, but you’re probably not quite as sure. It seemed like the most important thing to be focused on at that time. Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window), Anne Hathaway announced as co-host of the Oscars, Frequent is easier to recall than infrequent, Extreme is easier to recall than ordinary, Negative is easier to recall than positive, Recent is easier to recall than the distant past. This is why you can go on Facebook in a good mood, where youâre likely to use the availability heuristic to determine all your friends are having more fun without you, which then puts you in a bad mood. The most underestimated causes of death are asthma, tuberculosis, diabetes, stomach cancer, stroke, and heart disease. Another example of the availability heuristic is the tendency to favor more recent information over older information, because it is fresher in the mind. However, the presence or absence of a natural disaster in one year does not change the statistical likelihood of the same event occurring (or not occurring) the following year. People get this wrong because of the availability heuristic. Your feelings of the relative "goodness" or "badness" of a particular person, object, or activity impact the decisions that you ultimately make. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. Bushâs critics argued he had enacted regulation that would put people at a greater risk for cancer. Those who thought of only a few examples believed they rode frequently. You consider a p…  Pinker, S. (2018). Two economists detected the change in traveler behavior as late as January, 2002.. Those who could think of lots of examples of riding their bikes believed they rode infrequently.  Here are the results: You would expect that when arsenic risks went up by a factor of ten, willingness to pay to eliminate those risks would go up by the same amount. This sounds backward. However, while heuristics … Your brain needs to process more data than it can handle. In one study, people were asked how often they rode their bicycles. (Youâre bound to see more pictures of people windsurfing, eating an incredible meal, or having fun with their kinds than sitting on their couch on a Friday night bored out of their minds.). But by the tenth year, the number of insurance policies returns to the normal, predicted amount. A study compared 138 auto mechanics (experts) with 68 people who knew little about cars (non-experts). âPsychological probability as a function of experienced frequency.â Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (2):81. After seeing images of planes crashing into buildings, and hearing about chaos at U.S. airports, people opted to drive instead. & Schwarz, N. (2005). Today, we'll see how availability bias can factor in to our decisions. If youâre making a judgment about the present or the recent past, negative experiences will come to mind more easily. But this wasnât the case with the auto mechanicsâthe experts. For example, after seeing several news reports about car thefts… The new mandate didnât come without a cost. Things that are easier to recall have several attributes in common: Although the availability heuristic works by substituting frequency data for other inputs that come to mind more easily. Every day I spend time boiling the kettle – it takes me 10 minutes because the kettle is very old. Z. Locke and F. K. Goodwin: 1993, âEpidemiologic Catchment Area Prospective 1-Year Prevalence Rates of Disorders and Services,â Archives of General Psychiatry 50(2), 85â94. You get the wrong impression, because pictures of people on the beach have a disproportionate influence on your perception of how everyone else is spending spring break. Were you just promoted? Much of whatâs found on TV news is negative, extreme, and low probabilityâand this distorts your view of the world. The second group was asked to give ten (not two) instances.. As a result, you get a positive rating. A heuristicis a word from the Greek meaning “to discover.” It is an approach to problem solving that takes one’s personal experience into account. The availability heuristic simply refers to a specific mental shortcut: what comes to mind the easiestâwhatâs most availableâis true. (1990). You’ll think about when you’ve been stuck on the runway in a snowstorm.  Fox, C.R. People were asked to give reasons either in support of or against the use of public transportation. Are you more likely to die from a terrorist attack while flying, or are you more likely to die if you drive to grandmaâs for Thanksgiving? When itâs easy to come up with a list of assertive behavior–i.e. But when a cause of death became fifty times more likely than another cause of death, people overestimated the less likely cause. Before we discover why, letâs think about how recency interacts with frequency. What was surprising, however, was that this tendency was more pronounced when people were happy. In 1990, 68.6% of the same respondents gave a 1 in 10 chance, and in 1993 it rose to 75.7%. Was this the right decision? But if youâre a sad, focused expert in a submissive role, then you are more likely to rely solely on frequency data when making decisions. It’s easy to think of violent acts we’ve experienced ourselves or seen on the news. 4, 2012. 32, No. People who are asked to give many reasons for a choice they have made instead of a few reasons tend to be less confident in the choice they have made. Brace yourself, because things are about to get really strange. It has everything to do with how easy or hard it is to generate those examples. You look out for sharks when you should be running from coconuts. People spend more time looking at photos depicting negative events than photos depicting positive events, which indicates people pay more attention to bad events than good events when forming an overall impression. The problem with the second is that itâs easier to come up with some kinds of stories than others. when youâre multitasking instead of focused. 3, pp. If the availability heuristic compromises your ability to use frequency data when making a judgment, then the solution isn’t too difficult: rely on frequency data. This makes sense if you think about it: If itâs so hard to think of negative feedback, this must be a pretty great course. Some of these people were forced to drive because U.S. airspace was closed for three days after the attacks. But when they recalled ten details (not so easy), they believed it happened further in the past.  Kahneman, D. (2011). Description | Research | So What? In an experiment, researchers split people into two groups. We saw earlier that negative events are more likely to be recalled than positive events. But as it becomes harder to remember a flood, it will begin to seem floods donât occur very often after all. During 2006, the number of policies grew 14.3%âmore than three-fold the norm.. Think up some possible problems is easier for a non-expert than an expert.  Coconuts are not only more dangerous than sharks. Your times been wasted today? âPolicy Tenure Under the U.S. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).â Risk Analysis, Vol. But since you canât do both, your brain is forced to optimize between efficiency and accuracy. It’s spring break, and all your friends traveled somewhere warm. This trendâthe belief that violence is increasing, even as the world becomes saferâis covered in exhausting detail by Steven Pinker in his excellent book, The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. Third, when a cause of death had a 2:1 ratio or more–or, when one cause of death was at least twice as likely as the other–people could identify it as being more frequent. Researchers have found that when you are in a positive emotional state, you are more likely to perceive an activity as having high benefits and low risks.3 2.  Weick, M. & Guinote, A. To avoid the availability heuristic, acknowledge that your memory may not always serve you best. The problem with the first is that the couples that come to mind most easily are not representative of all couples that could come to mind. The most overestimated causes of death are botulism, tornado, flood, homicide, car accidents, other accidents of all kinds, and cancer. The groups were asked to produce either two arguments or ten arguments for reducing the number of years in school from thirteen to twelve. But offline, real-world interactions with your friends contain no such selection bias. Your perceived frequency is based on how easily instances of words that start with k come to mind compared to words where k is in the third position. You owe it to yourself and to others to avoid making decisions informed by how easy it is to call to mind relevant factors for making those decisions. âWhen and why is ease of retrieval informative?â Memory and Cognition 33(5), pp.821â832. But sometimes they cause real harm. He caved to the public outcry and reversed his decision, returning the standard acceptable rate of arsenic in drinking water to 10 parts per billion. How do we avoid falling for the availability heuristic? In one experiment, researchers asked business travelers passing through a busy airport to generate either two or six arguments for sending people to Mars. Availability Heuristic. People who were not in positions of power rated making two arguments instead of six arguments slightly easier: 5.77 vs. 5.36. Let’s start out with a couple of definitions: 1. In Bodenhausen , G. and Lambert, A., (Eds. As expected, producing more arguments made both groups less likely to agree that the number of years of schooling should be reduced. However, we can limit the impact that it has on our decision making by just becoming more aware. Even professional traders invest in companies they tend to hear the most about. , Whatâs even more strange is that itâs simply enough to expect thinking of examples to be difficult. You canât pretendâto yourselfâthat you have enough domain knowledge to make any kind of judgment. âEase of Recall vs Recalled Evidence in Judgment: Experts vs Laymen.â Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 81(1), 28â42. People who have compiled extensive evidence of their assertive behavior should believe they, themselves, are assertive. While everyone found producing more arguments harder than producing few arguments, happier people found it harderâwhich made happy people less likely than sad people to agree that the number of years of schooling should be reduced. People represent themselves positively on Facebook. Football is the ultimate sport of emotion. As a result, you are more likely to make bad decisions, miscalculate and overreact to risks, hold inaccurate perceptions about yourself and others, and behave in ways that arenât in your best interests. Options and information that is framed this way are favored over those that aren’t. Avoiding Availability Heuristic Lets look back at our availability heuristic example. They get you from point A to point B more quickly. Thatâs because everything about how we experience the world seems to point to one thing: that things are bad and getting worse. Here’s a picture of my teams snake: In this example there is one clear trend ‘Environment issues’, There is also one brittle test that wasted quite a lot of time as denoted by the three stars. ( Log Out / They remembered 8.22 of the 15 words, and it took 566 milliseconds. Watching the news makes you depressed. Your mood is a significant predictor of whether ease-of-recall will affect your judgment. âAutobiographical memory: unpleasantness fades faster than pleasantness over time.â Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(5), 399â413. There seems to be a range between 2:1 and 50:1 where our estimates are close. Two psychologists have found that people who have more than the average number of Facebook friends rely on the availability heuristic when they compare themselves to their friends, and as a result, they believe their friends are happier and have better lives than they do. Next, each group was asked to estimate on a scale of 1 to 7 how often they ate out. What do these experiences have in common? People in power (or who feel powerful) are more likely to rely on ease-of-recall when making a decision. Whether or not you think youâre assertive has nothing to do with how many examples you can generate to support your position. People experience more positive things than negative things. Availability influences influence your perceived frequency. Because people have trouble calculating the real risk of low-probability, extreme eventsâlike dying in an aviation-related terrorist attack, or dying in a car accidentâthey rely on non-frequency cues to determine how they should travel. when youâre a novice instead of an expert. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. The availability heuristic also affects whether, where, and how you invest your money. Youâll probably start by doing one of two things: First, youâll scan your memory of similar couples, perhaps thinking of couples with similar personalities or couples who have the same number of children. Accessibility revisited. They have only a few instances of bike-riding, so as a category, instances of bike-riding come to mind easily. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 111. Shortcuts are often good. If you find it easy to come up with a story, then youâll use the ease of creating the story as a shortcut for predicting divorce. Seek … We are working in an agile/Lean team clearly wasting an hour a day waiting for a kettle is not so lean. âLearning about an Infrequent Event: Evidence from Flood Insurance Take-up in the US.â American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol 6, no. Thinking, Fast and Slow.  Dyson, F. (2011). When they recalled two details from the bombing (easy! This indicates that recency affects ease of recall. People who are in a good mood are more likely to depend on how easy something is to recall, while people who are sad are more likely to think about the actual content of what they are recalling–not how easy it is to recall. Or, to put it differently, if youâre a happy multitasking novice in a position of leadership, youâre more likely to be afraid of sharks than coconuts than if youâre a sad focused expert in a submissive role. That, in turn, provides an easy formula for pessimists on the editorial page: make a list of all the worst things that are happening anywhere on the planet that week, and you have an impressive-sounding case that civilization has never faced greater peril. Acts of violence? With betting however it is important to think in long-term patterns , and ignore short-term form to a certain degree. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman. Thatâs because floods donât occur very often. Things get better with the passage of time. The first group was asked to give two instances when they ate out at a sit-down restaurant and two instances when they at a fast food restaurant in the previous four months. ), Foundations of Social Cognition.  Matlin, M. W. , & Stang, D. J. So if your brain is performing a recall task while doing something else, even though your recall will suffer (by 12.9%, it seems), the something else youâre doing will suffer even more.. Researchers then compared the responses of the groups asked about the previous four months and the previous spring. A product recall not only drags down one companyâs share price, it drags down the share price of the entire sector. Another way to avoid falling for heuretics is to start studying well in advance. âThere Are Many Reasons to Drive a BMW: Does Imagined Ease of Argument Generation Influence Attitudes?â Journal of Consumer Research vol. One study found that a flood results in an 8% increase of insurance policies above normal that same year. But people in power âreported a more favorable attitude toward sending humans to Mars after generating few as opposed to many arguments.â. Be famous for just one, but be really famous for it.