Menu
Esqueceu a senha? Fazer cadastro

::: Blog MPM

canon c500 mark ii vs sony fx9

02 12 2020

Buy Canon Cinema EOS C300 Mark II Camcorder Body with Touch Focus Kit (EF Mount) featuring Super 35mm CMOS Sensor, 4K, 1920 x 1080 60/50i, 23.98/25p, 24p, Canon XF AVC H.264 Codec, EF Lens Mount, Dual-Pixel CMOS AF Technology, 4" LCD Touchscreen with Mounting Kit, 2 x 3G-SDI Outputs, 2 x XLR Inputs, 2 x CFast Card Slots, Timecode I/O, Genlock In & Sync Out, Canon Log 3 … Everyone says DPAF is so great but I would love to see real world comparision. Sony vs Canon - PXW-FX9 vs C500 mkII First, a bit of history. To make it a fair fight I’ll need to add the price of the Canon EU-V1 to this comparison. The Canon C500 Mark II will cost around €15,000 without the Extension Units and optional PL Mount, but while that might seem a lot, it’s actually the same price the C300 mark II cost when it first came out. Whether or not you’ll be using a cage or third-party top handle is a different question. And take a guess on durability and servic-ability of each camera considering past models since these are knew, Another great review and insight FX9 is the new generation of Sony’s full-frame cameras and is intended to wrestle against the other full-frame rivals like Canon C500 mark II. *As of this writing. Sony PXW-FX9: https://geni.us/13TCB Canon C500 Mark II: https://bhpho.to/2VmTJSO My Sony FX9 Review: … As far as audio specs are concerned, here are the features: *XLR inputs are phantom powered, both mic and line level. The Canon C300 Mk II feels very solid and is cased in a sturdy Magnesium chassis. Its feature set is all around better than what’s offered internally in the FX9 (again, aside from the AF; Sony’s AF in the FX9 is stellar), and this is the umpteenth time I’ve seen someone compare the image of Canon Cinema Raw Light (from the C500 II or the C200) to the gold standard, Arri Alexa. The Sony FX9 with the Sigma 85mm Cine lens was incredibly detailed. all ; Most reacted comment ; Hottest comment thread ; Sort by: latest. I also think that the FX9 will be the superior performer in low-light, which wasn’t covered here. The Canon C300 Mk II feels very solid and is cased in a sturdy Magnesium chassis. As soon as you wanted to achieve more than 60fps, most of the cameras cropped massively into the sensor. If you’re using cine lenses or heavier zoom lenses then definitely yes. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. Filmmakers Philip Bloom, Nino Leitner, and Hans von Sonntag discuss the new full-frame cinema cameras – the Canon C500 Mark II and the Sony FX9. That’s a difference of $200 or so. So you can actually knock $1,000 off the price difference! You have three choices: I really don’t see the point of the V50. Sandisk CFexpress 256 GB. The C500 Mark II is capable of 60 fps at a full 4K resolution (unlike its predecessors), as is the FX9. The C500 Mark II features a Full-Frame CMOS sensor with an effective 18.69MP resolution and 15 stops of DR (claimed by Canon). Many thanks Sareesh for doing this comparison. At the time of this writing Canon hasn’t published the nits rating. The Canon 300 Mark II or the original C500 both had audio modules separate. If you’re just using Canon still lenses then probably not. Exclusive Bonus: Download your FREE Blueprint: How to make a movie. The C200 is currently $6,499. The EOS C500 Mark II supports Canon Log 2 and Canon Log 3 Gamma. However, there are major differences between the two. That’s a $650 dollar value right there. To know how ND numbers relate to stops, read the complete guide to in-camera filters. Sony hit the market at nearly the same time with their full-frame mid-tier option. Unlike the FS7, the Sony FX9 shoots full frame, and in *6k. Printable 29 MB PDF download for SUBSCRIBERS. For the average shooter, the data rates on the Sony FX9 are more manageable. All this means is you can desqueeze the image internally instead of having to use an external monitor. With the new Canon C500 Mark II snagging headlines with its release at the end of last year, it’s time to compare it to some other, more recent camera models— like the Sony FX9. The EOS C500 Mark II supports ACES 1.0 of the Academy Color Encoding System. You can always buy cheaper batteries, but the same applies to both cameras. *8 and 10 through using two NDs at the same time (6+2) and (6+4). The EOS C500 Mark II arrives with a full-frame sensor designed and built by Canon, which appears to be the same one found inside the EOS C700 FF, and this is capable of recording 5.9K video. Nino Leitner acts as a moderator of the discussion and he also has experience with the Sony FX9. It depends on the lenses you are going to use it with. Putting together a camera package in a modular system. To be honest I don’t know how practical this is. Both cameras can record HD proxies simultaneously. This allows it to feature a 5.9K output in full frame, and crop (window) the sensor for Super 35 and Super 16 frame sizes while maintaining a high resolution. I definitely pick the Canon C500 Mark II here. The Canon C500 Mark II has Dual Pixel AF with support for Touch AF and Face Detection AF. It is to be noted that the C500 Mark II ships with the larger A60 battery while the FX9 ships with a smaller (and newer) U35 battery. I am waiting for the C300 MK III to be announced. Sony’s videos have been impressive, but I feel the technology is only if you’re desperate. Designed for working professionals, as well as those who are looking to enter the field, the course gives detailed instruction on camera set up, operation and workflows. This feature will, without a doubt, elevate many productions, allowing filmmakers everywhere much more creativity. Furthermore, it features an interchangeable lens mount system, allowing you to swap out the mount by yourself without the need to send it to Canon’s labs. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. I am still very much in doubt which camera Im going to buy. Sony had the market and were pretty relaxed about it. There are dials there to be used by the non-operator. January 4 th, 2020. What you get: Both cameras have built-in ND filters, but they operate very differently. Only time and experience on set will tell if one of these cameras will claim the title of best mid-tier cinema camera. Also the auto focus will be slow working with EF lenses. The Sony workaround is not really practical. You can’t wait around hoping for the firmware to drop, or you might as well just wait for all of the firmware to be updated prior to buying the FX9. The Canon C500 Mark II also does anamorphic internally. We’ve already shared the basic specs and details of Canon’s new EOS C500 Mark II cinema camera, but our friends over at Cinema5D have gotten their hands on a unit and shared a ten-minute overview of the new full-frame cinema system.. However, the stabilization has to happen in post-production, with the FX9 utilizing their Sony Catalyst Browse/Catalyst Prepare software. One advantage of Sony FX9 is the variable electronic ND as opposed to classic internal variable ND with fixed stops in the C500 II. To be fair to the Sony FX9, it already has genlock built in. This difference also tells an important story. This feature is also compatible with any E-mount lens and allows for far faster processing than conventional NLE stabilisation (sic) workflows…. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. ibc footage full frame hands-on IBC 2019 FX9 Sony FX9. Sony has unveiled the FX9, a new XDCAM camera that features a 6K full-frame sensor, a hybrid autofocus system and, most interestingly, an E-mount for attaching lenses.. They’re both stellar cameras. From Sony: Canon sells the following two adapters, both with shim kits: Since we are comparing both cameras for the solo shooter or owner operator, I’ll assume you are okay with the standard EF mount for this comparison. The camera is based around a newly-developed 6K Exmor R sensor that features over 15 stops of dynamic range, Dual Base ISO (ISO 800 and 4000 in S-Log 3) taken from Sony’s Venice cameras and internal oversampled 4K … I like the C500 MK II a lot, but when you go all in with the rear EVF and an extra CFast Express card, the total comes to $19,000. MBps or MB/s is 8 times Mbps! *As of this writing. The proxies are 8-bit 4:2:0. They compare several aspects of both cameras – for instance, the lens mounts, color science, autofocus, and image stabilization. The sensor’s expansive native cinema gamut goes beyond that of current standards, including ITU-R BT.2020 and DCI-P3, helping the EOS C500 Mark II achieve more natural skin tones … Printable 29 MB PDF download for SUBSCRIBERS. Looking for more on cameras and video gear? I am a Sony shooter, and have to say, the C500 M2 has exited me so much, I many switch systems. Both of these cameras will easily find their place onto a lot of productions, in the very near future. The Canon EOS C500 Mark II 5.9K Full-Frame Camera Body is part of the Cinema EOS lineup of cameras, and it features a full-frame CMOS sensor with an effective 18.69MP resolution. The ability to record multiple channels and control them individually is important, especially for run-and-gun interview situations. Also, there is the question of the placement of audio controls. One of the biggest pain points of the C300 Mark II was the inability to record 60 fps at 4K. Will one of these camera systems reign supreme? I am leaning on the Sony because of price and it soothes my needs the best. This was a major reason why so many productions adopted an FS7 workflow. Thank you for a very thorough comparison! This camera is ready for any lighting situation you toss it into. It’s a no-brainer, really. *See below for which battery. CFexpress is a newer version of XQD, and the form factors are interchangeable. I’ve seen several tests that show the A9 outperforming dual-pixel autofocus cameras in many respects. thanks, How about discussing the menus and their ease of use…Canon vs Sony. This in-depth, hands-on workshop teaches participants the skills needed to operate the Canon C300 Mark II / C500 cameras. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. Both cameras are full frame, which means they also have Super35 mm modes. They compare several aspects of both cameras – for instance, the lens mounts, color science, autofocus, and image stabilization. Not many clients pay extra for 6K or RAW workflows. Now let’s get into the camera video specifications: *Dual Native ISO. 1. The two most exiting camera just announced – Canon EOS C500 Mark II and Sony PXW-FX9! 15. The only way you can know is if you use it yourself for a while. Like other websites The Canon C500 Mk II uses the same sensor as the Canon C700 FF, built into a versatile, modular compact form factor camcorder which is shorter than the C300 Mk II and body weighting just 1.75kg (without battery). Other than dual ISO, it ticks about every box. The biggest difference between the Canon C300 Mark III and the Sony FX9 is the sensor size. 3. The EOS C500 Mark II features Canon’s Dual Pixel CMOS AF Technology which offers high-speed Continuous AF. By the end of the two-days,. In this article we’ll look at all the important specifications relevant to video and see which camera is the better investment for the next 2-3 years for the owner operator. Both the FX9 and C500 MKII came out at the end of 2019, making them the ultimate competitors in … I believe it both camera give amazing flavor of video. Sony has unveiled the FX9, a new XDCAM camera that features a 6K full-frame sensor, a hybrid autofocus system and, most interestingly, an E-mount for attaching lenses.. The files output were also the easiest in post (post ready, no conversion). If you select Auto the camera automatically controls exposure through the right ND setting. Hence the single grip and viewfinder. Having to put that extra piece on the back of the Sony just to get SDI out is a deal-breaker for me, and a mis-step in my opinion… The modularity of the C500 M2, while maintaining the best image quality, is HUGE. I mean, after all these years, why is it still even a thing? Digibeta had just been phased out and the DSR-450 was the go-to Broadcast camera, with a selection of smaller Sony Cameras for B Roll. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. You need to add a separate wireless transmitter with the C500 Mark II. This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Canon is the class leader here, and with Canon’s range of cinema lenses there’s nothing left to say. We’ve already shared the basic specs and details of Canon’s new EOS C500 Mark II cinema camera, but our friends over at Cinema5D have gotten their hands on a unit and shared a ten-minute overview of the new full-frame cinema system.. Build . Add falling wood and more to your video with this comprehensive library of 80 impressive elements. The dynamic range of the C500 Mark II using the internal 10bit XF-AVC codec at UHD 25fps using Canon Log2 / C.Gamut (Color Matrix “Neutral”) shows a very strong 13.1 stops at a signal to noise ratio of 2, see figure 1 below (noise reduction “off”). The C500 MK II has the ability to record 5.9k raw internally, while the FX9 over samples a 6k image for a final 4k output, giving you a cleaner, crisper image, but still at a lower resolution than the MKII.. With a slightly larger sensor and higher resolution recording capability, we’re giving the point here to Canon.. Canon 1 Sony 1. With the Sony FX9, you have wireless built in, and then some with the XDCA expansion module. But so far…only in the mirrorless camera space. Their 35.7 x 18.8 mm sensor is also equipped with fifteen stops of dynamic range. The test will help show off the differences between the cameras as well as determine whether or not all those extra pixels are worth the hassle. Throughout the 11-minute video, Cinema5D takes a look at the overall unit, as well as the extension units, which make the camera even more modular … These cookies do not store any personal information. In the second half, Damian talks with PVC contributor and camera reviewer Brian Hallett about his thoughts on the Sony FX9 and the Canon C500 Mark II. Sony has revealed the new full-frame FX9 camcorder with a 6K sensor, Fast Hybrid Auto Focus system similar to the A7 and A9 mirrorless cameras and dual base ISO for great low-light performance. Cameras in this price bracket come with a certain level of image quality. Canon C500 Mark II Versus Sony FX9. Compare Sony PXW-FX9 vs Canon C500 Mark II | B&H Photo Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Keyboard Navigation Original batteries only, from B&H. It goes without saying AF for video works best and most reliably only with native lenses. If im only thinking profit I wouldn´t buy any of these, would I? The handle is also much more solid than on the Mark I, as Canon clearly realise that it will be used with film lenses which are … You were quick off the mark with great analysis, and you always seem know what the solo independent filmmaker/documentarian is looking out for. 1 - 2. Which one to choose? Very good point! On the other h… The Sony FX9 DOES capture 4K Full Frame, S-35 and Open Gate but doesn't capture on-board RAW or with the high data rate of the Canon C500 II. These are the cameras used in high end television and documentaries. One important thing to note is you get a free 512 GB CFexpress card and reader with the C500 Mark II. Of course, the big question is: Is the Canon C500 Mark II worth the extra $5,000? That means Canon EF for the C500 Mark Ii and Sony E for the FX9. It’s the camera that excites me the most. The Canon EOS C500 Mark II mixes the best of high-end cinema cameras and mirrorless tech, in a modular body that can be stripped down for drones or gimbals or dressed up for movies with external monitors and the like, or fitted with accessory backs to … In Intraframe mode. Compare Sony PXW-FX9 vs Canon C500 Mark II | B&H Photo Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Keyboard Navigation Dynamic Range Result of the Canon C500 Mark II at ISO 800 Please have a look at how we test dynamic range of cameras here . You need to pay $2,199 extra for a locking EF mount (called EF-C) from Canon. Canon EOS C500 Mark II - Full-Frame 5.9K ARRI ALEXA Mini LF Sony PXW-FX9 Teradek Bolt 4K MAX Panasonic LUMIX DC-S1H Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 6K SIGMA Full-Frame Classic Art … To be able to go low-profile on the street with just the little EVF at the back and some Canon glass, or pop the little camera on a gimbal, with it’s blazing fast autofocus, or build up a shoulder rig with large V-Mount batteries at the back to balance the camera- it’s what we have been waiting for- a flexible tool for the owner-operator. However, this issue has been resolved with the C500 Mark II, which is now capable of 60 fps at a full 4K, utilizing the entire full-frame sensor. That's in the realm of a used Arri Amira. Canon C500 Mark II vs. Sony FX9 - Panel Discussion - Philip Bloom, Hans von Sonntag, Nino Leitner - Duration: 26:45. cinema5D 18,359 views The C500 Mark II is for multiple kinds of filmmaking and videography, and you have to pick and choose what kind of viewfinder you need. Read More. A used FS7, or possibly an URSA Mini (with shoulder rig + Vmount battery), would suffice for quality production. Higher frame rates are available but in lower resolutions. Canon RAW is read by every important NLE directly. Share this article . But there are a lot of things that will come in a future update which i dont like.

Puerto Rico Map With Cities, Simple Triple Protect Moisturiser Spf 30, Kenai Weather Cam, How Long Will I Be Drunk Calculator, Weider Adjustable Dumbbell For Sale Canada, What Fungicide To Use On Pecan Trees, Seamless Fabric Pattern, New 7up Ad Cast, Luxen Home Outdoor Fountain,

::: Autor do post